Fra Tree of Life anmeldelse i The Guardian - ***** af ***** Peter Bradshaw:
But this is visionary cinema on an unashamedly huge scale: cinema that's thinking big. Malick makes an awful lot of other film-makers look timid and negligible by comparison.
Og tillykke med teorien Movie1000!
Alle har et fradrag, Helle hun har to ... Helle ... havets tournedos
Til rygkirurg imorgen og formentlig og forhåbentlig blive enige om at få operation to. Måneders tålmodighed er opbrugt, efter at have trænet ryg og håbe på, muskler langsomt kunne fjerne smerterne. Men de er tilbage. Har aflyst tur til Finland med bowling gutterne.
1/6, trods alt, i forhåbningen om, at det bliver bedre.
Alle har et fradrag, Helle hun har to ... Helle ... havets tournedos
Paul Schrader emailed: “The quality of theatrically released films has been dropping so precipitously in recent years that the Academy Awards are no longer a fair gauge of audiovisual entertainment. Several decades ago audiences could expect a film such as The Social Network every week; now we are lucky to have one or two a year. Add to this the fact serious dramas have more or less migrated to television, and it’s clear that the Oscars have become progressively less relevant. Last year arguably the best male performance of the year (Al Pacino in You Don’t Know Jack) was not eligible for the Oscars.”
That film, in which Pacino played Dr. Jack Kevorkian, was made for HBO and directed by A-list filmmaker Barry Levinson (Wag the Dog, Rain Man). It was apparently not possible for Pacino, Levinson, and a touchy subject to interest a major studio. This is a symptom of a desperate situation. It wasn’t even a problem with budget (about $12 million) or running time (134 minutes). It won an Emmy, but I confess I hadn’t heard of it until Paul mentioned it. Rotten Tomatoes doesn’t list a single review of it. Was it eligible for the Oscars? No. “Made for TV.” Kate Winslet’s work in Mildred Pierce is also not eligible.
Alle har et fradrag, Helle hun har to ... Helle ... havets tournedos
#8951 evermind 14 år siden
#8952 Bruce 14 år siden
But this is visionary cinema on an unashamedly huge scale: cinema that's thinking big. Malick makes an awful lot of other film-makers look timid and negligible by comparison.
Og tillykke med teorien Movie1000!
#8953 MMB 14 år siden
#Bruce
Hop herover og diskuter videre: http://filmz.dk/brad-pitt-laerer-sine-unger-at-sla...
#8954 Bruce 14 år siden
#8955 Antlion 14 år siden
http://www.suspektelektra.dk/
Tja...
#8956 Bruce 14 år siden
1/6, trods alt, i forhåbningen om, at det bliver bedre.
#8957 Åkepool 14 år siden
#8958 Batsy 14 år siden
#8959 Neranders 14 år siden
"That's rough, buddy."
#8960 Bruce 14 år siden
Summer Movie Special: Sequel Madness
6/6
Paul Schrader emailed: “The quality of theatrically released films has been dropping so precipitously in recent years that the Academy Awards are no longer a fair gauge of audiovisual entertainment. Several decades ago audiences could expect a film such as The Social Network every week; now we are lucky to have one or two a year. Add to this the fact serious dramas have more or less migrated to television, and it’s clear that the Oscars have become progressively less relevant. Last year arguably the best male performance of the year (Al Pacino in You Don’t Know Jack) was not eligible for the Oscars.”
That film, in which Pacino played Dr. Jack Kevorkian, was made for HBO and directed by A-list filmmaker Barry Levinson (Wag the Dog, Rain Man). It was apparently not possible for Pacino, Levinson, and a touchy subject to interest a major studio. This is a symptom of a desperate situation. It wasn’t even a problem with budget (about $12 million) or running time (134 minutes). It won an Emmy, but I confess I hadn’t heard of it until Paul mentioned it. Rotten Tomatoes doesn’t list a single review of it. Was it eligible for the Oscars? No. “Made for TV.” Kate Winslet’s work in Mildred Pierce is also not eligible.