Netop som Peter Jackson er begyndt at filme “Hobbitten”, er de forlængede udgaver af “Ringenes herre”-filmene på Blu-ray blevet annonceret.
Trilogien, der vil udkomme i en samlet boks bestående af ikke mindre end 15-diske, udkommer 28. juni.
Hver film vil være fordelt på to Blu-ray-diske for at opnå den bedst mulige billed- og lydkvalitet.
Der vil være over 26 timers ekstramateriale fordelt på 9 diske, deriblandt Costa Botes-dokumentarerne, der hidtil kun har været udgivet på Limited Edition-dvd-udgaverne.
Se også: Officielt: Optagelserne til “Hobbitten” er gået i gang – se billeder.
#31 Viking Wizard 13 år siden
Hvis du nu "gjorte" det samme, så vil du kunne regne ud, at Digwead laver sjov. Ikke andet.. Tag lige at slap af!
#32 Conar 13 år siden
blu-ray er 1920 x 1080
men du vil have 4000 x 2000?
nogle er aldrig tilfredse :)
#33 Notional 13 år siden
#34 Bruce 13 år siden
#35 IK 13 år siden
Ejer du ikke en blu-ray afspiller? ;)
#36 Conar 13 år siden
"A lot of people have asked about the new 2K remaster of Fellowship. Specifically, a few people have wondered if WHV was cheaping out by not remastering at at least 4K. We've confirmed that 2K was the resolution of the final post-production/editorial master for the film. So unless and until someone goes in and rescans all the film elements at higher resolution, then rebuilds the edit and re-renders all the visual effects at the higher resolution, 2K is the highest resolution element available to master a Blu-ray from. And that's what WHV has apparently gone back to. Today, this kind of film mastering work is mostly done at 4K, but back in 2000-2001, 2K was standard.
Nå, så må vi sammenligne med Alien Anthology som er mastered fra 4k, og se forskellen
#37 BN 13 år siden
Nej. Er jeg så yt og håbløst gammeldags og bagud nu? ;-)
#38 Conar 13 år siden
http://forums.highdefdigest.com/blu-ray-software-g...
I don't know of a single feature film made in the last 8 or so years that had a 4k digital intermediary. (restorations have been done in 4K) 2K is in fact the standard.
A study was done recently that found that most film release prints shown in your local theater have no more than about 1 to 1.5k of resolution after having been removed 3 or 4 generations from the ON and being projected through the typical optical quality of most theaters projectors.
This means that your local theater has little better than HDTV detail. And this was a study done with straight films prints with no DI. Most people who have seen 4k projected have described it as looking like 70mm. 4k would be cool, but most theaters now are installing 2k projectors, so that seems as though it will be the standard for some time to come.
DI for a standard 35mm film today is done at 2k and has been since the release of O Brother, Where Art Thou? in 2000. Seeing as most 2.35:1 films are shot in super 35 now a days, 2k itself might be over kill.
The Lord of the Rings films were scanned at 2K and that is the resolution they will stay at, unless the original camera negative is rescanned and the films re-color timed.
Again most modern films are NOT done at 4k. 2k is the standard. 4k projectors are out there, but most theaters are installing 2k because of the prohibitive cost of 4k.
Spider-Man 2 was done at 4k because it was going to be ported over to Imax. It was later discovered that the 4k transfer made no difference, and Spider-man 3 was done at 2k.
The Wizard of Oz restoration was done at 4k, and that, according to Robert Harris, probably exceeded the information available on the original negative. 3 strip technicolor is notorious for looking sharp because of the contrast, but actually holding fairly little detail.
#39 Reborn Sith 13 år siden
#40 Patriarch 13 år siden