I et nyligt interview som Canal+ havde med Steven Spielberg afslørede han, at efter han har skudt “War of the Worlds” går han i gang med at filme “Indiana Jones IV”. Optagelserne skulle dermed gå i gang i starten af næste år. Spielberg nævnte også, at efter Indy vil han lave en politisk film, hvilket højest sandsynligt bliver “Vengeance”, der omhandler kidnapningen af israelske atleter under de olympiske lege i 1972.
Denne nyhed skal måske ses som en indikation af, at der endelig foreligger et manuskript, som alle involverede parter kan enes om.
“Indiana Jones IV” forventes i biograferne i sommeren 2006.
#21 Captain Vallo 19 år siden
then why is my arse
the perfect height for kicking?
#22 filmz-andy dufresne 19 år siden
#23 region 2 killer 19 år siden
But, all that said: Despite its clearly being Spielberg's favorite and most personal film in the series — unresolved Daddy issues and all — Last Crusade commits two filmic sins I won't readily forgive:
It resorts to mockery. It's one thing when a sequel tweaks its characters a little — but Last Crusade revels in making fools of its protagonists, to the degree that it takes me out of the movie and undermines any sense of danger the film may hold. While I generally enjoy the Oedipal dynamic between Papa and Junior Jones, there's just one too many moments for my taste where Henry makes Indiana look like a total jackass. And don't even get me started about what they did to Marcus Brody: In Raiders, Brody is an obvious mentor to Indy and no minor badass himself; as he says, he's only five years too old to have undertaken the quest for the Ark himself. But in Last Crusade, Brody's a doddering buffoon, a drunk with Alzheimer's, a man who gets lost in his own museum. Watch how his comedy "bits" with Sean Connery almost derail any tension to be had in the desert battle with the tank. It's almost unforgivable. And Sallah, so resourceful and charming and filled with music in the first film, is kind of a doofus here, stealing camels for his relatives and otherwise serving as wacky-Arab comic relief.
The movie contains very few actual thrills. In Raiders, Indiana Jones took on sadists, Nazis and a fierce competitor (not to mention a pissed-off ex-girlfriend). In Temple of Doom, he fell into a subterranean hell and took on the very minions of Kali. In Last Crusade, he takes on a bumbling group of idiots — and, as a result, very little of the film's action leads me to believe that Indiana Jones is in any real danger. Seriously. Who are our bad guys here? Guys in fezzes? A Nazi commander out of a Mel Brooks movie? And, dear Lord, I very nearly forget that Julian Glover is even in the damned thing, and he plays the bad guy who gets the supernatural-disintegration treatment! And Glover was my old flame's acting teacher! Am I really supposed to consider this British-channeling-American slice of Wonder Bread a threat? Get back in your AT-AT, General Veers!
#24 filmz-Orion 19 år siden
#25 filmz-oliverstone 19 år siden