© Adidas

“Star Wars” – George Lucas’ nye Adidas-version af Cantina-scenen

Den famøse Cantina-scene fra “Star Wars: Episode IV – Stjernekrigen” har grundet en del omklipninger i tidens løb været genstand for mange brokkerier fra fans af stjernekrigssagaen, men endnu en gang har Lucasfilm lade scenen køre gennem redigeringsmaskinen – med Adidas Originals som hovedsponsor.

Filmsekvensen, der er lavet i forbindelse med den forestående 2010 FIFA World Cup, byder vanen tro igen på en række ændringer i den lille café på Mos Eisley. F.eks. er der nok ikke mange fans, der kan huske, at Snoop Dogg var til stede – og vil Greedo mon skyde først denne gang også?

Star Wars Adidas-Cantina-scenen kan ses her.

Læs også Filmz-artiklen: Lucas skyder først – og sidst.


7. jun 2010 23:23 Kilde: SCI FI Wire Ikari

Læs også

Trailer: 'Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckogning'
Eksklusivt klip: Marvels 'Thunderbolts*' kæmper imod Winter Soldier
Trailer: Harrison Ford som Red Hulk i 'Captain America - Brave New World'
'X-Men'-forfatter skal skrive de næste 'Star Wars'-film
Ny 'Star Wars'-serie udgiver officiel trailer

Vis kommentarer (66)
Gravatar

#31 Lord Beef Jerky 14 år siden

#30 Hvilket minder mig om, at jeg ikke har fået tjekket hvornår Monkey Island 2 remaket rammer markedet... heh.

EDIT - sært.. ingen dato endnu, den skulle bare komme til sommer... jeg troede det var sommer... dammit!
"Avatar blev skrevet flere år før Pocahontas, og dermed (forhåbentlig indlysende) også før Irak krigen"
Gravatar

#32 filmz-Bruce 14 år siden

Hvis blu-ray udgaven af Star Wars er færdig så er min røv en vandflyver. Ikke bare hvilken som helst vandflyver, men Howard Hughes Spruce Goose. Det er dæleme et monster. Men da jeg stadig kan komme igennem toiletdøren, så er blu-ray udgaven af Star Wars altså IKKE færdig! Slå den!'

Her er screenshots af HDTV udgaven og her.

Her er en sammenligning af DVD og HD, men læg mærke til, at der er tale om udvalgte billeder.

Der er 1½ år til SW udgaven på BD skal udkomme. Hvis man allerede er færdig med at scanne ind i 4 eller 8K og denne er brugt til HDTV udgaven, er det godt nok en velbevaret hemmelighed. Hvis man har brugt og vil bruge den gamle master, er denne i 2K og Lucas vil få maksimalt ballade fra hele verden, hvis han spiser os af med det gamle transfer, som der var MANGE problemer med.

The Secret History of Star Wars skrev:
The film needed to be digitized to release it on DVD in the first place, and when Lucas decided to make further changes to the film, the highest quality source was sought for scanning--the negatives. This would create a new master digital negative that would serve as a base for Lucas' definitive version of the film. There are a number of caveats that resulted from this, however.

One was that the negative was scanned only in HD resolution of 1080p, in 10-bit RGB. [36] This was a state worse than the primitive 2K scans ILM had done for the SE. By contrast, when Blade Runner was restored and enhanced in 2007, the live-action was scanned at 4K, the normal standard, and the visual effect shots at 8K. Godfather's 2008 restoration was scanned at 4K for the entire film, while Wizard of Oz's 2009 release was done at 8K. Why Lucas chose to source his master from a paltry 1080 HD scan is hard to fathom, especially when 4K was long in place as the standard, with 6K and 8K looming on the horizon as a viable replacement since data storage was becoming cheaper. One reason may be because Lucas was shooting the two prequels--Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith--on the Sony CineAlta, which itself was 1080 (being the first generation of HD feature-film cameras). This is another undoable element of the prequels--filmed on 1080p HD, they have, at the most, less than half the resolution of the 35mm original trilogy, with some arguing that 35mm resolves 5000 lines, meaning they have just under 1/5 the resolution (Phantom Menace was shot in 35mm, but then scanned in 2K--which is still an improvement over the following two films). With the new 2004 SE existing partly to link the six films, this was indeed the case as the original trilogy was lowered in resolution to that of the first three episodes. Ironically, as Lucas moved into more "high tech" digital arenas, the quality of the image slowly declined, going from a 35mm original, to a partly-2K 1997 SE and then a fully-1080p 2004 SE. According to Videography, the negs were scanned on a Cintel C-Reality telecine, at 1920x1080 resolution, in 4:4:4 RGB, recorded to Sony SR tape. [37]

The second caveat that resulted from scanning the O-neg is one that was irrespective of the output resolution, and this was that they were once again working from a copy of the film without color-correction, since the meticulous work YCM Labs did existed only on the SE's Interpositive (again, the O-neg can't have its physical image corrected, it has to be produced on a copy). Perhaps because of the fact that Lucas had lost all of his color-work, he embarked on a new principle--instead of faithfully reproducing the look of the original release and photography, as had been the case on the previous re-release, it could be digitally manipulated to have a slicker look that matched the high-saturation, high-contrast look of the three prequels.

The 2004 SE (it has never been marketed as a Special Edition, though there really is no other label to describe it) had its color correction guided and supervised by George Lucas himself. [38] Screening the film at Skywalker Ranch, Lucas went through the film with members from ILM, who would be color-timing the digitized film themselves at Lucas' approval. [39]

This is one of the most controversial aspects of the release. While the revised film obviously is meant to have a deliberate look, what was released is a sloppy mess, in technical terms; blacks are crushed, colors bleed and pop distractingly, video noise is visible because of the oversaturation, skin tones are inconsistent and often very pink, scenes have weird casts to them (i.e. the Millennium Falcon scenes look very green), everything is much too dull and dim, contrast is not nominal, and many of the lightsaber effects are the wrong color (pink for Vader, green for Luke). The coloring is not even consistent with the prequels in some instances, whereas the originals were--for instance, the original blockade runner scene was meant to be Kubrick-esque bright white, while on the 2004 release it is a dull blue, yet strangely in Revenge of the Sith it is the bright white it is supposed to be. Lowry is often mistakenly pointed at as the culprits of these highly noticeable flaws, but in fact it is Lucas himself. The final DVD product has been screened for Lucas multiple times since, such as at Celebration III.
Wishlist hos Axelmusic: http://www.axelmusic.com/wishlist.php?uid=11140
Gravatar

#33 filmz-Claudius 14 år siden

#31

Mht. til Monkey Island 2 Special Edition, så giver Kotaku dig ret.
http://www.newsweek.com/2010/04/30/why-i-hate-3-d-and-you-should-too.html
Gravatar

#34 Martin Schou 14 år siden

Er jeg den eneste, der finder det dybt ironisk at slutte af med "Celebrate originality" i en reklame som er et tydeligt opkog på en nu gammel film? Hvad er der lige originalt ved det?
Gravatar

#35 Lord Beef Jerky 14 år siden

#34 Jeg forstår det som, at det er selve reklamen som celebrater originality. Men ja, den er jo tydeligvis ikke super original.
"Avatar blev skrevet flere år før Pocahontas, og dermed (forhåbentlig indlysende) også før Irak krigen"
Gravatar

#36 De4_Kia 14 år siden

Utyske (22) skrev:
#21 -

Come on, lad os nu ikke ryge ind i en pikmålingskonkurrence om hvem der har set mest Star Wars og hvorfor din almægtige forståelse er bedre end min.

Jeg VED hvad de spoofer, jeg har set filmen OG scenen mange gange og jeg finder ikke reklamen sjov - er det virkelig så svært at forstå?

Aha.... :) Og du har naturligvis billeder af disse originale Star Wars-udgivelser, så du kan bevise dette?


Jo du må da gerne få lov at se et billede af de udgaver jeg har stående.
Har uploadet et billede af alle udgaverne, som kan ses her: http://i46.tinypic.com/1dypp5.jpg Er det ikke godt nok til at overbevise dig, tja så er det dit problem. jeg ved hvad jeg har stående :)
Gravatar

#37 filmz-Bruce 14 år siden

De4_Kia (21) skrev:
Jo du må da gerne få lov at se et billede af de udgaver jeg har stående. Har uploadet et billede af alle udgaverne, som kan ses her: http://i46.tinypic.com/1dypp5.jpg Er det ikke godt nok til at overbevise dig, tja så er det dit problem. jeg ved hvad jeg har stående :)


Enhver kan downloade en komprimeret udgave af 1080p i Sky eller HBO HDTV udsendelsen, lavet på den gamle 2004 master. Det er så absolut længder bedre end DVD udgaven, men hvis det bliver BD udgaven næste år, så har Lucas toppet grådigheden.
Wishlist hos Axelmusic: http://www.axelmusic.com/wishlist.php?uid=11140
Gravatar

#38 Bony 14 år siden

De4_Kia (36) skrev:
Jo du må da gerne få lov at se et billede af de udgaver jeg har stående.
Har uploadet et billede af alle udgaverne, som kan ses her: http://i46.tinypic.com/1dypp5.jpg Er det ikke godt nok til at overbevise dig, tja så er det dit problem. jeg ved hvad jeg har stående :)


Christ. Det er længe siden jeg har set så meget BS samlet et sted. Ethvert piratsvin kan da hente lortet på nettet og downloade fanmade covers. Men det er alligevel imponerende, at et eller andet random tøsebarn på 22 fra Odense, kan have eksemplarer stående af noget som resten af verden venter på og nok må betegnes som en af de mest ventede. Hatten af for dine kontakter i branchen!
Nyeste anmeldelse: "The Thin Red Line" : http://bonysblog.wordpress.com/
Gravatar

#39 filmz-loke76 14 år siden

Det var da en kedelig reklame.. Robot Chicken har lavet meget bedre Star Wars

That´s what I like about them highschool girls man. I get older, they stay the same age.
Gravatar

#40 Nightjaxs 14 år siden

Var en fed reklame, ville måske være bedre hvis snoop røg af lyssværdet bagefter, han hakker i dem :P
Guns dont kill people, but they sure do help.

Skriv ny kommentar: