Michael Moores kontroversielle film “Fahrenheit 9/11” modtog i går et rekordlangt bifald ved visningen på Cannes Film Festivalen.
Filmen, som undersøger forbindelsen mellem George W. Bush og Bin Laden-familien, samt dokumenterer det højaktuelle emne om tortur af irakiske krigsfanger, blev hyldet med et 15-minutters stående bifald af publikum, der inkluderede folk som Darryl Hannah og Mick Jagger.
Miramaxs chef Harvey Weinstein udtalte, at det var det længste bifald han havde set i 25 år.
“Fahrenheit 9/11”, som deltager i hovedkategorien om De Gyldne Palmer, får dansk premiere 13. august.
#11 Patriarch 20 år siden
#12 filmz-west 20 år siden
Oh well, passer mig udemaerket .. :)
Hvis den bare er halvt saa god som Columbine, har vi jo noget at se frem til .. ^_^
#13 DarkLight 20 år siden
Moore's talent består i at stille tingene op på en måde, der er god til at forarge. Han klipper fra sort til hvidt, og kan derved tillade at stille spørgsmål ved ting som folk ikke tænker over i hverdagen.
Det er underholdende, og han er dygtig til det han gør. Men hvis det er den slags dokumentar man kan lide, så er en aften i Cirkus lige så godt.
#14 ks 20 år siden
#15 filmz-Satyr 20 år siden
bedst er vel http://www.hardylaw.net/Truth_About_Bowling.html
#14. For lige at paste lidt.
Objectivity: (sample email): "Your entire article is retarded. We're talking about making FILM. ALL film is subjective. Have you not even taken an entry level course in film before?"
Response: The point is not that Bowling is non-objective, or biased. The point is that it is intentionally deceptive. Can we agree upon one core premise: to deliberately deceive a viewer is wrong?
#16 El vez 20 år siden
...eller noget :)
#17 filmz-bullseye 20 år siden
#18 Corgan 20 år siden
Var det ikke noget med at Michael Moore har forsvaret det der stod på den hjemmeside eller noget? Jeg mener at der var én her på siden der linkede til noget omkring det engang.
Kan det være dette her?
(Sorry, jeg har ikke lige tid til at nærlæse artiklen jeg linker til.... så feel free to correct me if I'm wrong)
#19 Patriarch 20 år siden
#20 filmz-scheel77 20 år siden
Udkast fra sidste del af artiklen:
I can guarantee to you, without equivocation, that every fact in my movie is true. Three teams of fact-checkers and two groups of lawyers went through it with a fine tooth comb to make sure that every statement of fact is indeed an indisputable fact. Trust me, no film company would ever release a film like this without putting it through the most vigorous vetting process possible. The sheer power and threat of the NRA is reason enough to strike fear in any movie studio or theater chain. The NRA will go after you without mercy if they think there's half a chance of destroying you. That's why we don't have better gun laws in this country – every member of Congress is scared to death of them.
Well, guess what. Total number of lawsuits to date against me or my film by the NRA? NONE. That's right, zero. And don't forget for a second that if they could have shut this film down on a technicality they would have. But they didn't and they can't – because the film is factually solid and above reproach. In fact, we have not been sued by any individual or group over the statements made in "Bowling for Columbine?" Why is that? Because everything we say is true – and the things that are our opinion, we say so and leave it up to the viewer to decide if our point of view is correct or not for each of them.